|
|
| HR and the Law in the News
February 2007, Volume 6, Issue 2 |
|
There is No Party in 3rd Party Harassment
If you are a PEO, temporary employment agency or company that has temporary workers on your site, this case should be of particular interest to you. On January 11th the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia held that a third party client company (and possible joint employer) could be held liable for unlawful retaliation against a temporary, agency worker. In Coles v. Harvey, Kelly Services ("Kelly") had a contract with the Walter Reed Army Medical Center ("WRAMC") to provide clerical workers. Ms. Coles was hired by Kelly to work at WRAMC. One Friday, Ms. Coles complained to two WRAMC representatiaves alleging that she was being sexually harassed and threatened by an Officer-In-Charge ("OIC"). On Monday, Ms. Coles spoke to the same two WRAMC representatives. One told her she was fired for a timecard discrepancy; the other told her she was fired for filing a formal complaint against the OIC. Simultaneously, a third WRAMC representative called Kelly and reported that Ms. Coles falsified her time card and was rude to patients. Based on that complaint, Kelly terminated Ms. Coles' employment. Ms. Coles first sued Kelly and lost; the court found no unlawful retaliation because Kelly did not know about the harassment complaint at the time they terminated Ms. Coles' employment. Ms. Coles next sued WRAMC and the court held that she could proceed on her claim of unlawful retaliation under Title VII against WRAMC. Lessons Learned? First, be sure to conduct a full, prompt and proper investigation of any alleged workplace misconduct before taking any adverse employment action. Although they "won" the case, Kelly may have been able to avoid any litigation by getting the employee's side of the story before terminating her employment rather than relying solely on the client's version of the events. As a client company, WRAMC might have avoided or limited liability by calling Kelly and having the agency inform the worker that she was terminated rather then telling the worker directly. Companies often inadvertently create joint employment relationships with a temporary employment agency by exercising regular control over not just what temporary workers do but when and how. Second, get your story straight! This newsletter has shared stories in at least two previous editions (March 2005; February 2004) where an employer was found liable for an unlawful employment action because it gave conflicting reasons for taking a particular employment action. Tips? Whether you are a company that uses a PEO, temporary employment agency or other non-traditional workforce, be sure you are creating the relationship with workers that you want. There are advantages to joint employment relationships but you need to know in advance if that is what you want. Similar concepts apply when using independent contractors.
Hot Hits! Education Corner
February's Public Seminars/Speaking Engagements: Ms. Walters will be presenting three of five programs offered as a part of the Associated Builders' & Contractors, Inc., Baltimore Metro Chapter, HR Academy and participating in the final panel presentation. All sessions are from 3-5 p.m. in Towson, MD. Dates and topics are as follows: February 6th, "HR Audit for Small Business;" February 13th, "HR Tips and Tools: Policies, Procedures and Practices;" and Feburary 20th, "Coaching, Counseling & Correcting." Contact the Association at the website above for more information or to register.
February's Client Training Programs: " HR & the Law for Managers" "HR for Non-HR Managers"
|
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||